@j_k_knox 'Other people who read Knox 2014 (250) also read Gillespie 2013 (199)' with nos in brackets being no of citations #mscedc
— Cathy Hills (@fleurhills) March 16, 2017
Tweet!
Leave a Reply
@j_k_knox 'Other people who read Knox 2014 (250) also read Gillespie 2013 (199)' with nos in brackets being no of citations #mscedc
— Cathy Hills (@fleurhills) March 16, 2017
@j_k_knox Siemens' LAM shows all aspects of ed. Does personalised lrng, prediction, warning, alerts etc erode self-reg and meta cog? #mscedc
— Cathy Hills (@fleurhills) March 16, 2017
Text and language are code too. Do we want world shaped by a language majority don't speak? #mscedc
— Cathy Hills (@fleurhills) March 16, 2017
@Chris_Barker @j_k_knox Can't all be coders but yes, more knowledge = better understanding of algos' scope, dangers and failings #mscedc
— Cathy Hills (@fleurhills) March 16, 2017
Smtimes only aware of algos when they go wrong so we should work to understand and reveal or we become (even) more like puppets #mscedc
— Cathy Hills (@fleurhills) March 16, 2017