This is the last of my coloured in pictures from my Brain Colouring Book from the INMED conference. It perfectly summed up both my journey and the overarching theme of the human within the technical that spanned my blog.
Dr Macleod recommended Zeros + Ones in my Understanding Learners in Online Environments and I thought it sounded perfect for this course. I went to the library early on the way in to work, found it quickly and went through the self check out. Upon trying to exit I set off the alarms and security told me I had to go back in. Checking my phone I had a confirmation email confirming the book was now checked out to me. So I could neither leave with the book nor leave the book behind, and risk getting fined in a month’s time. I returned to the self service machine and it cheerfully told me to report to the desk, which being early was still closed. Trapped!
It was then a matter of waiting inside for the librarians to arrive. As it turned out it took quite a few attempts on their part and several different machines to ‘unsecure’ it and set me free.
All in all a very timely experience demonstrating the need for human intervention in a machine driven world. Librarian superhero!
We have discussed, shared and debated the pros and cons of all things digital in today’s world but over the last week technology has allowed me to connect with someone that I had no physical access to. This link, simultaneously fragile and strong, was nothing short of miraculous at the centre of an extremely difficult time.
Just Pinned to #mscedc: Close Up Photography of Spider Web · Free Stock Photo
As I worked through my blog in readiness for submission I noticed a comment from Jeremy regarding adding my own handwritten notes and remembered that I had made notes throughout the Petar Jandric webinar. So this a link to the image file of those.
This video featured in Sian’s talk from last week in my stream and I wanted to embed it separately as inspiration both for criticality but for creating a digital video artefact. I also added the first iteration in the post before to compare and contrast how things had developed over the intervening years.
A really great bunch of Edtech women have done a lot of work with very little visibility from which femedtech is emerging – slowly. We have created connections with each other and explored how we can make space for people in education and technology to support each other.
This blog post by Audrey Watters caught my eye after seeing her Edinburgh talk and it really brought home just how serious people are beginning to take having their data out on the open web. The reason for the deletion activity given by Audrey is:
I am growing increasingly uncomfortable about the way in which our historical data is weaponized online. Tweets are particularly susceptible to this – they’re particularly easy to decontextualize.
This is a perfect example of the necessity of context and made me wonder how all of the items in my Lifestream would look in isolation.
Petar will introduce the tradition of critical pedagogy through three generations, starting with the work of Freire, then writers such as Giroux and McLaren, and finally considering the latest generation of contemporary authors.
One of the most common tropes in Edtech portrays teachers as fearful of technology and out of touch with the new 21st Century reality. When educators have concerns about technology, they are are dismissed as being “primarily emotional, not logical.”
I attended this talk at Dublin City University in November 2016 and thinking about the course content nearing the end of our stream lead me to revisit it and Sian’s paper from block 1. The topics covered arose from the Digital Education manifesto and reminded me of how we can look to the future whilst still weaving in the human.
This Tweet caught my eye as it was by someone who is going to delivering a keynote at an institutional event in April and the Tweet prompting the comment is added below. This is relevant for my human thread in that it isn’t the technology that is the worry it is our implementation of it, and whether or not it is for the good of the people.
People misunderstand the danger from AI. It's not that robots will rise up. It's that dangerous algorithms will be made by oblivious people.
A colleague offered to lend me this book knowing about my studies and the colouring book was part of a Medical Education conference pack in February and seemed a perfect element to feed into my stream – I am looking forward to colouring in several of the pictures for my feed.
Hi Jeremy, my annotations were an attempt to critically consider the data that was gathered yet not actually used, as well as what was used. So in answer to your question I think context could be measured to some extent without more sophisticated analytics.
For example, if the report had considered my weekly average with the class weekly average (rather than the displayed course average) then it could have acknowledged ‘something’ going on across the class. So the low numbers would look less stark against the class numbers for each week.
Going a step further by combining this with the data that it was one week before the end of the course it could have provided supportive feedback such as “Congratulations, you are nearing the end of course, keep up the good work. You may be finding it difficult to stay motivated at this point but don’t forget to login/join conversations for the last week – it may help with your assignments(exams).”
Essentially, flipping the existing data into supportive encouragement rather than demotivating ….
from Comments for Clare’s EDC blog http://ift.tt/2nwu9ut
I really enjoy creating these visual representations of social networks – I try to focus on the connections and not the ‘top’ quantitative data. Knowing that the software is open and free for all to use also highlights the community feel to the process and Martin Hawksey, the creator, always welcomes interaction. A true example of online community.
It seemed only fitting to include my LARC report for the week after discussions around learning analytics. I have annotated it briefly with some notes but it definitely serves the purpose of highlighting the need for context. Without any context it would baffle an outsider, showing a poor level of social interaction, engagement or attendance.
A quick overview is that it was week 9 of a ten week course and two assignments were looming in my mind. I was focused on working on my learning challenge for the first of these and prioritised this along with reading and planning my writing. None of this was captured in the ‘numbers’. It also didn’t compare the week with my fellow classmates but to the course average which meant there was no direct comparison. This might have served to show some of the context as many of the others would be generating similar reports for the same week.
This short clip with Bonnie Stewart (referenced earlier in the module) sums up eloquently the importance of networked learning and community in our unstable world. It highlights the blend of human interaction with network communication and how one informs the other.
I think this is the only TV show that I have watched every session in full, right to the end. Looking at where we are now, it seems pretty much on course to be a prediction of our dystopian future – algorithms in control 😱
from Comments for Clare’s EDC blog http://ift.tt/2m8P7jb