This post is from Week 11 but I feel it relates more to Week 10 so through the published date I can now turn back time haha!
via IFTTT https://t.co/A22lGjnj4N http://twitter.com/LinziMclagan/status/848861001479057408
— Linzi McLagan (@LinziMclagan) April 3, 2017
The Early Years Summit is an annual online CPD event for Early Years Practitioners. Each year the summit provides in-depth training in the fundamental skills, that is required when working in Early Years settings, through interviews and presentations with leading experts and practitioners. Access is free until March 31st but a lifetime access pass can be purchased for £25. There are quite a few videos uploaded each day that can last up to 1 hour, therefore, it may be difficult to watch and retain the information in the short timeframe that the access is given for FREE. Intrigued by the online CPD opportunity, I registered for the free access and membership and was instantaneously delighted at the first video available; Sally Goddard Blythe on Improving Personal, Social and Emotional Well-Being Through Physical Development. Now this interview of what looked like a recorded Skype chat was fascinating and I found the conversation extremely valuable in regard to my Early Years classes and projects. The content was an in-depth discussion of academic research and findings and although I found this easy to follow and put into context I had to consider the relevance to Early Year practitioners or assistants that I come across on a weekly basis. Their approach is less academic and they are hands on with the children. The content may be valuable but the information that is disseminated through video and an ‘in the mind’ learning approach may be problematic as the visualisation of the knowledge may be difficult to transfer into the day to day approach within the Early Year setting. Although a wonderful initiative it falls back to how and when learning happens. Is it enough to just listen to a conversation? Should one be a part of that conversation to allow full understanding? Is listening the only form of learning and should visual representation or examples be available? How can the learners then take the information gained and put it into practise which will solidify learning and allow retention?
from Pocket http://ift.tt/2kkXyDl
In this TED Talk Wayne McGregor shows us his passion for dance and through creativity he speaks of the process in which one discovers their physical and cognitive habits. Dance provides an ability to express ones own voice. His language brings forwards a wonderful point of view that describes technology of the body and that it is the most technologically literate thing that we have. The body provides a means to communicate, it’s a process of physical thinking and a collaboration of both mind and body. We are experts in regard to proprioception and don’t really think about it until something goes wrong or we unable to use our abilities in regards to dimensions, space, technology or as a means to communicate and read an environment. What I would like to explore is how can we use kinaesthetic intelligence in regard to online education? When learning is assumed to be a process that takes place in the mind can we enhance experience through muscle memory and spacial awareness?
I am considering doing this for my Dissertation….Do you think it will be possible??
In an e-mail from Coursera there are definitely algorithms at play as I am sent a list of recommended courses. The selection of courses have a connection with my current MOOC ‘The Brain and Space’ but I am not in a position to take on another course. I consider browsing the list and even read a few in depth before coming to my senses. I can’t help but feel tempted and wonder if Coursera are putting pressure on me to expand my education? Is it for my benefit or a marketing strategy to increase course numbers and financial gain? I then start to consider the algorithms that may influence student course choices and career pathway. Do students find themselves being led down the garden path where they are navigated to a course that may not be suitable or necessary. Are algorithms making choices and narrowing a selection of courses that will shape ones career and life direction?
Beer, D. (2016). The social power of algorithms. Information, Communication & Society, 20(1), 1-13. DOI: 10.1080/1369118x.2016.1216147
Knox, J., 2014. Active Algorithms: Sociomaterial Spaces in the E-learning and Digital Cultures MOOC. Campus Virtuales, 3(1), pp.42–55.