— Renée Hann (@rennhann) January 17, 2017
@Eli_App_D good choice-most agree it's best.More disturbing;closest to RScott's intention.Enjoy!You'll prob want to watch other cuts after;)
— Renée Hann (@rennhann) January 18, 2017
Of course, I didn’t want to give anything away to Eli.. but what I was really curious about was whether she would come away thinking of Deckard as a replicant or not, and how that would colour her interpretation of the film/the themes within it. One can’t unsee what one has seen (nor see what one has not;): my first Blade Runner was the theatrical version (none of the others were ‘out’), where it remains ambiguous whether Deckard is a replicant or human. What I like about the notion of Deckard being human is that it allows a deeper interrogation of what it means to be human: through his work/killing, Deckard is increasingly dehumanised, while the replicants’ love for each other, attachment to life and overt emotional displays make them seem ever more human. In this context, with Deckard as human, his love at the end of the film for Rachel, a replicant, appears rehumanising – yet, what can that mean if there is no difference between replicant and human?
In what ways do you/does “modern life”/neoliberal post-industrial society force you to act like a ‘robot’?