Tweet! Respecting IFTTT

It’s no secret that I’ve fought a long battle with in order to get it to act the way I want and do the things I expect of it. This week I chose to look at it from outside the setting of my course blog and look at the tool in its “natural” habitat and I was actually a bit impressed. It can do some really useful things to help make life a bit easier, like send a text to my wife to let her know I’ve left work, or send a text when I am at a certain point on the journey home. This one is handy for knowing when to put the tea on but I found another use for it.  I thought it would be a great piece of data to use to show that algorithmic data can easily be misinterpreted and how different people might interpret it differently.

I set this up to publish a post to my blog to let the world know every time my phone GPS picked up that I was at Moray House, School of Education. My thinking that as a student of Moray House, this would be seen as significant and could be interpreted that I was there to visit the library of for studies. The fact that the algorithm should kick off twice every day, once in the morning and once at around 5:15 pm, I thought might imply that I as arriving and leaving for my day’s studies.

My intention of this play around with the algorithm was to see what conclusions my classmates drew from the minimal data:

  1. Eli is a student of Moray House School of Education
  2. Eli’s GPS from her phone is showing as at Moray House School of Education each morning at the same time and
  3. each evening at the same time.

It’s not a lot of information to go on and therefore involved “interpreting” what this information means. This was exactly the point I wanted to make, that with learning analytics, we are interpreting data, when we may not actually have enough of the picture to fully understand that data in context. As Yeung( 2017) stated of algorithmic use, in her paper concerning the use of data to affect behaviours,

Big Data ’ s extensive harvesting of personal digital data is troubling, not only due to its implications for privacy, but also due to the particular way in which that data are being utilised to shape individual decision-making…

Unfortunately, my experiment didn’t happen as, yes you guessed it, the IFTTT algorithm didn’t work, not even once. So instead of having a minimal amount of data to interpret to represent our possible failures of learning analytics, we have an algorithm that doesn’t fire at all and returns no data. I guess this gives us a whole different learning experience and another algorithmic potential to be critical of.


Yeung, K., 2017. “Hypernudge”: Big Data as a mode of regulation by design. Information, Communication and Society, 20(1), pp.118–136.


my frustration at the lifestream blog ideas and my inability to force it to fit a mould I want it to be in.  Image from © 2017 Pixabay


I’m finding the weekly roundups annoying and I wonder if I’m maybe not doing this correctly. I’ve been pretty much writing a step by step “did this”, but I feel that doing that with 250 words doesn’t leave any space for thought or reflection on things and it irks me.

I feel like I want to reflect, talk, discuss more but the lifestream idea kind of gets in the way. Week 6 for me will be about trying to stretch this blog to give me more space to collect my thoughts on readings, themes and the course.

How do I have a blog (as in the standard definition of a blog with blog posts), but that is also a lifestream (as in randomly generated online clutter that wasn’t intended to be collated to represent anything) that represents my online identity as a member of this course?

Something to ponder.